MaidSafe founder David Irvine asked the U.S. government in June 2014 to create and enforce a monopoly on his behalf. On January 1 of this year, the U.S. government agreed to do so. The monopolistic grab goes by another name, too: patent.
The following computing process is what Irvine now claims he owns:
“A method of storing data from a first node on a peer-to-peer network. The method includes creating a public and private key pair for a data item.
The method also includes determining a hash value for the public key and assigning the hash value as a user identifier for the user of the node.
The method also includes storing the public key within a distributed hash table of the peer-to-peer network. The user identifier corresponds to the key for the public key within the distributed hash table.”
Will Irvine attempt to say that the patent applies to the unreleased MaidSafe protocol? It’s unclear. But if he does, the irony goes deep.
MaidSafe bills itself, among other things, as a network to protect users from online spying. Thanks to Edward Snowden’s leaks, the U.S. government’s “National Security Agency” (NSA) is now well known as the largest spy network in the world.
In other words, Irvine may well be asking the spies to help him protect you from their spying.
Once upon a time, many people believed that unless monopolies (patents) on ideas were enforced, no one would have any incentive to come up with any new ideas. Crazy, I know.
Then folks like Satoshi Nakamoto came around and proved that you can actually become a billionaire while giving away your ideas (making them “free and open source”). In fact, all cryptocurrencies prove that proper incentives definitely exist outside government interference. Most of the great ideas in the history of the world were released without patents.
But it would seem that in spite of all the evidence, some like Irvine are still less interested in honestly marketing a product than they are in leveraging the (dying) power of monopolization.
Again, it’s not entirely clear if the networking process that Irvine’s attempting to monopolize will have any effect on MaidSafe’s future users (should the code ever be released). Many certainly hope that it will, as MaidSafe was given over US$7 million dollars by the crypto community earlier this year to deliver their product.
If the monopolization attempt does affect MaidSafe, there is a fitting response. Most in the crypto community believe in self-regulation. If you believe that Irvine’s patent-seeking will negatively affect the MaidSafe network, the best way you can express that is to not use it and tell others to steer clear, as well.
What do you think of Irvine’s move? Share in the comments below.
Did you enjoy this article? You may also be interested in reading these ones:
Are you holding on to your bitcoins hoping their value will increase? Why not trade in the meantime using up to 8x leverage. Profit in rising, falling or flat markets. Find out more at https://www.coinarch.com/
The following computing process is what Irvine now claims he owns: “A method of storing data from a first node on a peer-to-peer network. The method includes creating a public and private […]
All this week, the crypto market has been under a microscope both by politicians with regulatory power, and throughout the… Read More
You’ve probably heard of Bitcoin, the disruptive cryptocurrency rollercoastering up and down in value daily (today one coin is worth… Read More
watch nowVenture capitalist Tim Draper told CNBC on Friday that bitcoin is good for humanity and that federal regulators should… Read More
Born in 1899 in Vienna, Nobel Prize-winning economist F.A. Hayek is a legend of sorts in voluntaryist, libertarian, and crypto-economic… Read More
Hardfork Enables Completely Untraceable Currency Transactions at Low Cost, Precedes Upcoming Particl Open Marketplace Mainnet Launch Particl , the open-source… Read More