With a recent market cap of $790 billion, it's too late to buy Bitcoin cheaply. But newer cryptocurrencies like The Sandbox (CRYPTO: SAND) and Polkadot (CRYPTO: DOT) offer potentially better growth prospects at a much lower price point.
Let's explore the reasons these assets could soar in 2022.
1. The Sandbox
Worth just $4.2 billion, The Sandbox is small fry compared to major cryptocurrencies. But that could change as its developers work to create the first blockchain-based metaverse. Sandbox's early mover advantage and user-generated content strategy could set it up for success.
According to Wired.com, the metaverse can be defined as a persistent virtual world that continues to exist when you aren't playing. And it has been a hot topic since social media giant Meta Platforms (formerly Facebook) announced plans to spend $10 billion to develop the concept in late 2021. The Sandbox aims to leverage blockchain to create its version of the metaverse, which will benefit from decentralization and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), digital proof of ownership stored on the network.
According to its white paper, The Sandbox aims to create a virtual world where people can "build, own, and monetize" gaming experiences, similar to the publicly traded company Roblox, which uses a similar model.
The Sandbox has already started sales of NFT-based digital real estate in its metaverse. And it launched its Alpha season two in January to allow users to build experiences using its game-creation engine and compete for cash prizes as high as 20,000 SAND, which would be worth nearly $100,000 at the current exchange rate.
2. Polkadot
With a market cap of $24 billion, Polkadot is much larger than The Sandbox, but it is still cheap compared to assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum (recently worth $790 billion and $360 billion, respectively). Polkadot offers a unique spin on development of decentralized applications (dApps), which are programs built on a blockchain network. And it can enjoy significant long-term growth as the overall industry expands.
Polkadot is unique because it operates two different blockchains: the main network, called the relay chain, and multiple additional chains called parachains, which can be programmed to create applications that can interact with other blockchains. This system gives developers more flexibility to customize their applications while benefiting from the security and infrastructure of the Polkadot network.
Polkadot began its first round of parachain auctions in November, with projects including Ethereum-compatible smart-contract platforms Acala and Moonbeam winning slots on the network. While these projects are still in development, they could become an exciting proof of concept for Polkadot's innovative take on blockchain technology.
It's not too late to hop on board
Everyone wants to get in on the ground floor of a long-term growth opportunity. Polkadot and The Sandbox fit the bill because of their small market caps and compelling strategies for success. The Sandbox is best for investors who want to invest in the entertainment potential of blockchain technology, while Polkadot is a bet on blockchain infrastructure. But both look poised for success in the new year.
10 stocks we like better than The Sandbox
When our award-winning analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has tripled the market.*
They just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and The Sandbox wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
*Stock Advisor returns as of December 16, 2021
Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Will Ebiefung has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns and recommends Bitcoin, Ethereum, Meta Platforms, Inc., and Roblox Corporation. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
